A woman in her 30s suffered a severe allergic reaction after she was prescribed a medicine for a fungal nail infection by her GP.
Shortly after taking the medicine she developed a rash on her body. But when she returned to her GP, she was assured her condition was not related to the prescription and was given aqueous cream for the outbreak.
Despite the rash spreading further, her GP said she should continue to take the medicine.
She visited an out-of-hours service on a bank holiday Monday and was seen by a nurse who also dismissed concerns that the rash was a reaction to the medicine. However, within a couple of days, the rash covered her entire body, leaving her so unwell that she collapsed and was taken by hospital by ambulance.
She spent two weeks in hospital, during which time doctors diagnosed her as having a severe allergic reaction to the medicine prescribed by the GP. The client also suffered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and was left with a scar on her lip and inside her mouth from where she hit her face when she collapsed.
Click here to find out how much compensation you could receive.
Great service, never made things complicated!
Gotelee were instructed to advise her on a claim for damages against both the GP and the out-of-hours service on the basis that she should not have been prescribed the medicine in the first place (it was established that she did not have a fungal nail infection that required treatment) and she should have been told to stop taking the medicine as soon as the rash appeared.
We obtained experts reports to confirm that it had been negligent for the prescription to have been given and for her to have been told to continue to take the medicine. As the claim progressed, we were able to assist the client in obtaining early treatment for her PTSD.
Despite the evidence we had gathered, both defendants denied they had been negligent in the treatment of the client. As a result, we had to issue a claim in the County Court. The GP surgery and the out-of-hours surgery both filed defences denying any wrongdoing at all and sought to blame each other with a view to prolonging the claim.
However, we were certain that both defendants had been negligent and that both had contributed to the client’s detioriation and collapse.
We continued gathering further evidence while at the same time seeking to negotiate a settlement that would bring the matter to a conclusion. Ultimately, the defendants agreed to pay the claimant £30,000 plus the costs of the claim and the matter was settled without the need for further court proceedings.
Lord Chancellor Liz Truss has announced that the government will cut the discoun...Read Article
"Jade Shelton was absolutely fantastic!! Professional and proactive at all times."
"The ease that we could access and speak to Pat Smith - Thank you"
"“ This is the second time we have used Tracey for the conveyancing to buy our new home. She is always completely approachable, she has helped us along the way with advice and useful tips that has helped lessen the stress. We have complete confidence in her and would not hesitate to recommend her to our friends and family”. - Peter Dawes, Cater Dawes Financial Planning "
"I don't think this house sale would have pulled together without Jo's determination and expertise. Excellent!"
"This is by far the go-to firm for any issues. You are made to feel valued from the outset and they are so confident in what they do. Wouldn't recommend any other. Thank you Hugh and Max."
- Ros Jones
"Approachable, very efficient, always willing to take my calls and update me."
"I would like to say thank you for your help, support and guidance over the last two and a half years. Obviously should I need further assistance in the future I shall not hesitate to call you guys."
"We found Rachel Dawson outstanding, polite, professional and caring."
"Prompt, helpful, polite and very professional service"
"Jade made the process of buying our first home quick, easy and took the stress out of a new chapter of our lives"